.
He would force a movement against Reid, yet Obama chooses to have his liberal strings manipulated by the donkey pupeteers. A paradox for all American citizens of character, but especially for the 90%+ of blacks who voted for Obama and do not fall into the "safe" category for blackness. Please read on ...
.
Which category would Dr. MLK fall under, and by the way, all of the below are "unsafe" for being U.S. President in the eyes of Reid:
1) dark-skinned blacks with a negro dialect,
2) dark-skinned blacks with no negro dialect, or
3) light-skinned blacks with a negro dialect, or
.
Yes Sir, MLK falls into the "unsafe" category #2 in my porky opinion (impo), so he would have no chance of becoming a democrat puppet in the 2009 U.S. Presidential race, agree? Obama happens falls into the 4th category deemed as "safe" in the eyes of Reid:
4) light-skinned with no negro dialect.
.
So should everything be fine, forgiven, and forgotten? Uh Uh, I think there are "mo betta" facts cable and satellite TV are failing to cover in fear of losing advertising dollars in this "politically correct" world.
.
Ever wonder why Reverend Jesse Jackson Sr. wanted to "cut Obama's nuts off"? It has everything to do with MLK's Dream impo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zS883xWTKOg
.
IMPO, today's political correctness is backfiring for the Donks, and Obama is proving to be just another politician; a failure in terms of "MLK's Dream". Obama is a Chicago 'Yes Man' with little backbone.
.
This pig looks-forward to the 1st true black president, as now the road is paved for him/her to be a fiscal and social conservative, not just some big government, regulate and control, tax and spend, light-skinned- dialectless-socialist-sellout.
.
My porky guesstimate is a majority of blacks are anti-abortion, in favor of lower taxes, and welcome competition in the free-markets. Obama's actions are opposed to every single one of those principles. And now Obama has let down the 3 aforementioned categories of "African-Americans".
.
This should make tomorrow's MA Senate race and the Nov, 2010 midterms a lot more color blind, but especially for the 3 categories of blacks he failed to stand-up for. What would MLK's reaction to Reid's comments be? Paradoxically, he'd never get a chance since he falls into that "unsafe" category of "negro", is this pig on to something? please read on ...
.
Bring on Alan Keyes or Charles Payne, they happen to have much darker skin than Obama, but do they understand what free-market prosperity has accomplished for the world, along with social conservative values. Republican National Chairman (RNC) Michael Steele must be commended for speaking out forcefully against Reid.
.
Michael Steele could have chosen to forgive since he also falls into that 4th "safe" category: light-skinned with no negro dialect. Yet Michael Steele is a man of solid conservative principles, similar to MLK's timeless wisdom: "MLK's core beliefs, such as the power and necessity of faith-based association and self-government based on absolute truth and moral law, are profoundly conservative".
.
This white capitalist pig is proud Steele represents the Republican party, and perhaps ALL blacks will begin to realize they are voting with a herd mentality. Down with hypocrisy and up with honesty. If you're a democrat and still reading, congratulations, because the argument is about to get much stronger.
.
Reid looks to get away with judging Obama by the color of his skin and dialect, fully aware that the content of Obama's character is despicably evil. It's a fact that Obama was the only person in Illinois to vote in favor of : "Infanticide":
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NzRhZTgzNmRlZWE0MTA1YTM4NWMxN2UxMjA5YjBkZTE=/
.
IMPO, there'll always be some sort of racial tension, especially in a young melting pot like the U.S.A., yet this capitalist pig judges and ultimately befriends a person not based on their color, accent, or dialect, butt by the consistency of their moral character.
.
Oh-oh-oh, my fat pig snout would be remiss if I didn't mention fiscal-conservative principles in favor of a cyclical Darwinian-type free-market, not a bigger governemnt, tax and stimulate us to death plastic economy.
.
Last butt not least, why not throw a bone to the born-alive infants as well, please? Hence we get to liberty for all, from conception to natural death.
Dr. Martin Luther King must be doing grave-spins during the year of this Apologist in Chief called Barack Obama.
http://psychologyofthecall.blogspot.com/
5 comments:
I voted for him, never again.
Nate from Detroit
Indeed, MLK is doing grave-spins. Obama is the complete opposite of everything MLK represented. MLK would be disgusted with our first black president.
MLK sought justice and equality for blacks, based upon their CHARACTER (which Obama sorely lacks), NOT the color of their skin. Obama uses the race card. He aligns himself with African Americans when it works to his benefit. Race is no substitute for character.
MLK spoke of liberty interests, "life, liberty, and the PURSUIT of happiness." Obama is a socialist dictator--he despises free-market prosperity and strives to make Americans DEPENDENT on the government. Obama treats these core American liberty values with disgust and utter disrespect.
Obama may share MLK's race. That's where any similarity ends.
loved it, you are good ..
marty g.
Martin Luther King hated whites, you are missing something I feel.
Susan from California
I mostly liked the MLK quote at top. The piece is too hard to swallow in 2010.
Sandy
Post a Comment